About Me

Name: Roger
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Those Who Mislead Us

    If you know me, either personally or through my writing, you know that I have an intense commitment to truth.  Either things are true, or they are not true; any other view is irrational.  Those who deny absolutes live in denial, the most likely option, or they are insane.  To make any kind of sense of the world or its people, we need to know what is true.  Unfortunately, those whose job it should be to help us have decided that their job is to control us by manipulating information.  Such people can be found in several places:  the media, politics, and schools.

    Because of the first, those who supposedly report news in print an broadcast media, many don't really know what is going on.  They are ignorant of fact, truth, and reality; such ignorance is dangerous and must go.  This subject holds some degree of personal interest for me because I learned to report news, when objectivity and impartial presentation were the absolute norm.  I have written for newspaper and for radio, where I broadcast the news.  I find the present lack of principle and, therefore, credibility pathetic and harmful.  People must recognize the problem and demand a restoration of appropriate standards of reporting.

    The second group of people who seek to confuse by dishonesty are generally recognized, so much so that "honest politician" is practically an oxymoron.  What troubles me is the willingness or gullibility of those who ignore the half truths and other lies of a Barack Obama or any other candidate they prefer.  Elections offer us less choice and seem to limit our influence over dishonesty, but I suspect we get it because we tolerate it.  Consider Bill Clinton, parsing words like "is" to rationalize his flagrant deceit; it cost him his freedom to practice law, and yet people still admire him.  Perhaps that shows just how deeply our national character has slipped.

    The third group, like the others, ought to be people we may trust.  The difficulty here is that many are not so much dishonest and deceived themselves.  What an irony it is that those who teach have been mislead by those who have taught them.  I have gained a great deal of disheartening insight into the government-controlled system of schools, overshadowed by all manner of sociological mandates and burdened by a surfeit of highly paid bureaucratic agencies and administrators, none of whom teach.  Today, I learned why, and I will write more when I have digested what I have discovered.  For now, you might check out John Taylor Gatto, a recognized New York City and New York State "teacher of the year" and author of The Underground History of American Education, which you can read on his web site.  I highly recommend his American Education History Tour, which takes only a few minutes to take.  I also listened to a recording of his appearance on a radio program; I think it's worth the time investment, especially if you are a parent or a teacher.  One professor of education has called his books "scathing" and "one-sided and hyperbolic, [but] not inaccurate," a rather telling observation.

    How long can our nation and culture survive this deluge of dishonesty?  Why do we tolerate people who mislead us and, by doing so, lead us only God knows where?  Gatto might say that we are the victims of a decades long effort to make us ignorant and biddable, so that the movers and shakers behind the scenes, what some call the "shadow government" can take us into "a new world order."  He doesn't call it a conspiracy.  As one who believes in God and in His and our adversary, I could see a more "devilish" plan.  Regardless, to know is to gain power to do.  We don't have to let other mislead or mis-lead us.  We have the brains and, as yet, the liberty to take charge of the direction of our lives, to liberate the lives of the next generations, and restore truth to our nearly truth-less society.  The question is "Will we?"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Big Lies and the Liars Who Tell Them

It is a great importance to set a resolution, not to be shaken, never to tell an untruth. There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible and he who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and third time, till at length it becomes habitual, he tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing him. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart and in time depraves all its good dispositions.”--Thomas Jefferson

Like Jefferson, I believe that truth, honesty, and transparency are critical values in both personal and public realms.  Lying is wrongLying is destructiveLiars cannot be trusted.  A habit of lying and deception reveals a corrupt character and a twisted soul.  In the public life of the United States, we see pleny of lying, corruption, and twisted souls, I'm afraid.

 Lying has become a big part of politics, a part I consider evil, as I wrote recently.  Untruth has so corrupted public education that I urge responsible parents not to trust their children to public schools, especially Christians.  The media, that used to seek and defend the truth, uncover deception, and expose liars, now willingly repeats and makes its own lies.  I hate to admit that I have become cynical about American culture, but politics, now the arena of hypocrites, is merely the most obvious indication that “everyone lies.”  Lying seems to define American culture.

That brings me to the latest “Big Lie,” one that has created a stir.  I had heard fragments of the story, but I had missed the original controversy completely.  In catching up on some of my reading on-line, I learned what all the fuss was about.

Rush Limbaugh is undoubtedly a controversial figure; but, love him or hate him, no one can deny his single-handed creation of talk radio’s popularity and of AM radio’s profitability.  Rush, like it or not, is an American original, and those attacking him are foolish and unprofessional.  On the one hand, the brazen deception by those attacking him, of late, is shameful, reprehensible, and wholly inappropriate to the dignity that should characterize those holding high offices in our American republic.  On the other, I don’t see how his adversaries can possibly come out ahead in this because, as they say, “Cheaters never prosper.”

The struggle to know what is true is one of the most important undertakings of our lives, especially in the spiritual realm.  Being wrong there will have eternal consequences, if we Christians are right; blindly following religious leaders, who may either be honestly wrong or willful deceivers, can devastate this world.  Even what appear to be “good intentions” may be unfruitful or even destructive because truth, untruth, and dishonesty become muddled.

I appreciate Tim Allen’s Home Improvement TV series because he does a great job of showing the realities of marriage and family in a basically positive light, without being moralistic.  In more than one episode, however, I have disagreed when Tim and wife Jill tried to work out when it was and was not acceptable to lie to people.  That’s the problem; we want to live in a world where we can lie but expect others to tell the truth.  We try to parse lies into good and bad categories, ignoring what Jefferson knew, that lies are corrupt the liar.

Lying is always wrong but it is especially egregious in politics.  How often do liars condemn others for lying?  How many of us believe those who affirm the positions we like and doubt or condemn those who hold views we oppose?  Nobody gains much by supporting liars, regardless of their professed ideology or the promises they make.  Trusting a liar is simply stupid!  You can’t trust a hypocrite, regardless of his party or positions.

I find dishonesty in science deeply troubling, especially when it is married to a social agenda and political aspirations.  A case in point, the Nobel Committee has given Al Gore the 2007 Peace Prize for his “efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change.”  I have no idea what this has to do with peace, except in the minds of “one-world” socialists.  I enjoyed hearing the news in conjunction with the story about a British judge who “ruled that Gore's apocalyptic movie on climate change, An Inconvenient Truth, should come with a warning that it promotes ‘partisan political views’ and is riddled with errors.”  So, “There!” Al Gore, Nobel nuts, and kooky environmentalists!  It’s just too bad that facts don’t matter when it comes to indoctrinating kids or robbing American citizens.

Finally, thank God for those who do speak honestly.  This time it was Ann Coulter who said, when asked, that America “would look like New York City during the Republican National Convention. In fact, that's what I think heaven is going to look like.”  When pressed, she was clear:  “People were happy.  They're Christian.  They're tolerant.  They defend America."  Awful, huh?  To illustrate the speed at which the adversarial media can morph a straightforward, an Adweek article writes, “Ann Coulter suggested that the U.S. would be a better place if there weren't any Jewish people—and that they should ‘perfect’ themselves into Christians.”  The real conversation, of course, never quite said that.  Coulter’s remarks were basically standard Christian theology, just not politically correct enough for her prickly host or the politically correct bloggers.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »